Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!bunker!hcap!hnews!129!89.0!William.Wilson From: William.Wilson@p0.f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org (William Wilson) Newsgroups: misc.handicap Subject: Re: GUIDE DOGS Message-ID: <14223@bunker.UUCP> Date: 19 Sep 90 02:08:43 GMT Sender: wtm@bunker.UUCP Reply-To: William.Wilson@p0.f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org Distribution: misc Organization: FidoNet node 1:129/89.0 - BlinkLink, Pittsburgh PA Lines: 36 Approved: wtm@bunker.UUCP Index Number: 10444 MW> Let me stand up for Willie while I'm sitting here. No MW> where in any of Willie's "Guide Dog" messages did I MW> perceive a negative attitude toward any Guide Dog schools. He MW> may have been reflecting on someone else's negative comments MW> but he has nothing to gain from badrapping another school. [This is from the Blink Talk Conference] Maggi, And I love you too! It appears, as Vixen said a long time ago, that we can expect each of us who use guide dogs to defend our respective schools. Unfortunately, it also seems that some of us, in our defense read words in other's messages that just wern't there! This all started, you'll remember, when I said to Vixen, "When you're number 1, you don't need to advertise". This was supposed to be a joke in response to her comments about the San Raphael line of clothing. Admittedly, it wasn't very funny, but hey, a joke is all it was! Then Dan, I believe, started talking about Seeing Eye policy, as if any of us has any real knowledge of it, and Greg and others jumped right on it! Go ahead back and read all the messages in this thread and I sincerely believe you will find that the only guide dog school getting the bad rap here is Seeing Eye, exactly what I was asserting from the beginning, so again, why is this? Willie ... BlinkTalk, Dr. Deb and Silver in Pittsburgh! -- Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!129!89.0!William.Wilson Internet: William.Wilson@p0.f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org