Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!info-high-audio-request
From: eyal@echo.canberra.edu.au (Eyal Lebedinsky)
Newsgroups: rec.audio.high-end
Subject: Re: DBX
Message-ID: <6372@uwm.edu>
Date: 17 Sep 90 18:23:32 GMT
Sender: news@uwm.edu
Lines: 14
Approved: tjk@csd4.csd.uwm.edu

In article <6354@uwm.edu> gould!infocenter!smatchun@encore.encore.com (Scott Matchunis) writes:
[... intro deleted...]>
>Anyone out there in "netland" using DBX on a cassette deck?  What do you
>think of it?

I use a DBX222 on my deck (Nak580m and Nak700II). This is used on top of
Dolby B and I like it very much. The 10db emphasis in the hights does
tend to saturate the Dolby - so dolbyC will be much prefered. I did some
A/B comparisons with CD source and TDK SA90 tape and could not pick any
breathing (the most common complaint in wideband compressors).

-- 
Regards
	Eyal