Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!GAFFA.MIT.EDU!Love-Hounds-request
From: Love-Hounds-request@GAFFA.MIT.EDU
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Subject: Re: gaffa-is there a problem?
Message-ID: <9009192048.AA14554@gaffa.MIT.EDU>
Date: 19 Sep 90 20:48:52 GMT
References: <1990Sep19.192349.6033@cbnews.att.com>
Sender: Love-Hounds-request@gaffa.MIT.EDU
Reply-To: Love-Hounds@gaffa.MIT.EDU
Organization: The Zik Zak Corporation -- "Know Future"
Lines: 23
Approved: love-hounds@eddie.mit.edu

Really-From: Jon Drukman <jsd@gaffa.MIT.EDU>

>Really-From: nrc@cbema.att.com (Neal R Caldwell, Ii)
>
>> Really-From: derek%sunstroke@sdsu.edu (Derek Langsford)
>> Anyone else had the problem? 
>> 
>> Is it something our moderator (Doug) can fix?
>
>Nothing is ever wrong with gaffa.  It is always at your end.   Gaffa is
>perfect.
>
>:-) :-) :-)

It is indeed gratifying to see that Richard is finally getting a
handle on how love-hounds operates.  Keep up the good work.

(Seriously, it is not gaffa's fault.  A machine somewhere along the
line gets messed up.  Incidentally, lobby |>oug to change the software
back so that you don't get those stupid Really-From headers, with
everything apparently coming from "love-hounds-request."  He claims it
gives him too much work the other way, but as I know for a fact that
he's doing zero work on it anyway, it won't matter...)