Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!apple!hercules!sparkyfs!usasoc.soc.mil!aero!cs.duke.edu
From: gazit@cs.duke.edu (Hillel Gazit)
Newsgroups: soc.feminism
Subject: Re: equal rights?
Message-ID: <653610832@lear.cs.duke.edu>
Date: 17 Sep 90 22:33:54 GMT
References: <9009170909.aa10633@ICS.UCI.EDU>
Sender: nadel@aerospace.aero.org
Organization: Nefolet shel nemushot
Lines: 13
Approved: nadel@aerospace.aero.org
Status: R


In article <9009170909.aa10633@ICS.UCI.EDU> (Cindy Tittle) writes:
>Hillel is, of course, overlooking the fact that NOW does not, and
>never has, represent all feminists, as much as they (or he) would like
>that to be true.

Look Cindy, the actions which are done in the name of an idea represent
that idea, in reality.  It is true for Christianity, Communism, and any
other ideology you can think about.

It is also true for feminism.

For some reason, almost every *action* of feminism is linked, this way
or another, to NOW or its leadership.  If you don't like these actions
you are free to do something else, and try to offset that action.