Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!umich!mailrus!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request From: amb@ai.mit.edu (Andrew Boardman) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Help Needed With Panasonic KX-T2355 on Rolm System Message-ID: <12599@accuvax.nwu.edu> Date: 25 Sep 90 00:02:52 GMT Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu Organization: TELECOM Digest Lines: 30 Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 679, Message 3 of 11 >A "single line" analog interface on a Rolm is reasonably compatible >with any standard telephone. Only the proprietary Rolmphone and ETS >interfaces aren't. I've attached lots of ordinary things (answering >machines, speakerphones, 1A2 key, etc.) to Rolm lines. No sweat. At least on the 9751, the standard interface for the proprietary sets is indeed standard; for POTS devices the interface card is a costly add-on. >What makes Rolms tricky is that they use a human interface model >that's optimized to allow the fully-priv'd business phone user This is what makes it massively inappropriate (IMHO) for the frequent university setting. The student users enjoy none of the privs with all of the hassles. An illuminating paraphrase from Columbia University administration after their recent installation: "This system is perfect for our use. We realize that it raises manifold problems for the student population, but you guys are only here for four or five years; we *work* here." Makes me wonder who these universities are for, anyway... >but of course you then need a second (analog) line for your answering >machine, modem, etc., just as with any fancy PBX. Analog phones: the moden-day undergrad dream... Andrew Boardman amb@ai.mit.edu