Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!cmcl2!kramden.acf.nyu.edu!brnstnd
From: brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: more on TRUE and FALSE (side-comment)
Message-ID: <18292:Sep2203:27:3090@kramden.acf.nyu.edu>
Date: 22 Sep 90 03:27:30 GMT
References: <181@thor.UUCP> <14084:Sep2105:38:0890@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <18097@haddock.ima.isc.com>
Organization: IR
Lines: 11

In article <18097@haddock.ima.isc.com> karl@kelp.ima.isc.com (Karl Heuer) writes:
> In article <14084:Sep2105:38:0890@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein) writes:
   [ incorrectly ]
> >#define STREQ(a,b)  ( *(a) == *(b) && *(a) && !strcmp((a)+1, (b)+1) )
> #define STREQ(a,b)  ( *(a) == *(b) && !(*(a) && strcmp((a)+1, (b)+1)) )

Yes, you're right. Sorry. Thanks also to Peter Montgomery for pointing
this out. In any case it's better than the original macro, whether
strcmp is inlined or not.

---Dan