Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!sps!wwb
From: wwb@sps.com (Bud Bach)
Newsgroups: comp.object
Subject: Re: Do we really need types in OOPL's?
Message-ID: <276@sps.com>
Date: 24 Sep 90 12:56:31 GMT
References: <0yw10qr@Unify.Com> <275@sps.com> <698@servio.UUCP>
Organization: SPS - Indialantic, FL
Lines: 18

In article <698@servio.UUCP>, riks@servio.UUCP (Rik Smoody) writes:
> ...
> Instead, I think we need to treat the Protocol itself as a first-class object.

Good point, since protocol errors are quite common.  I am not aware of OOPLs 
that treat protocol like this.  Can you give me some references?

> 
> Let's not feel bad if it's not immediately obvious: even my favorite
> OO environment (the Earth) is not perfect.  People sometimes ask the
> wrong questions at the wrong times.  (oh what a lovely tangent to digress along  8-)

I hear you!
-- 
Bud Bach   					Voice:  407 984-3370
Software Productivity Solutions, Inc.		FAX:    407 728-3957
122 4th Avenue					email:  wwb@sps.com
Indialantic, FL  32903				or:     ...!uunet!sps!wwb