Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!taurus!huxley!jxxl
From: jxxl@huxley.cs.nps.navy.mil (John Locke)
Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk
Subject: Re: Evidence (was Re: Musing on Constitutionality)
Message-ID: <1474@huxley.cs.nps.navy.mil>
Date: 25 Sep 90 19:22:31 GMT
References: <8306@helios.TAMU.EDU> <26938:Sep1814:48:2390@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <4572@qip.UUCP> <8418@helios.TAMU.EDU> <4619@qip.UUCP> <37497@ut-emx.uucp>
Reply-To: jxxl@taurus.cs.nps.navy.mil (John Locke)
Organization: Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey CA
Lines: 9

In article <37497@ut-emx.uucp> mnemonic@walt.cc.utexas.edu (Mike Godwin) writes:

> Actually, the federal government argued strongly for the position that
> the Pentagon Papers should be regarded as stolen *property*.

Although, as I recall, Ellsberg copied the Papers on a Xerox and snuck
the copies out a few at a time.

--