Xref: utzoo comp.os.os2.misc:254 comp.windows.ms:5662 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!odetics!frank From: frank@odetics.com (Frank Merrow) Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc,comp.windows.ms Subject: Presentation Manager and/or MS-Windows 2 or 3 Message-ID: <1990Sep26.204620.10987@odetics.com> Date: 26 Sep 90 20:46:20 GMT Reply-To: frank@odetics.UUCP (Frank Merrow) Distribution: na Organization: Odetics, Inc., Anaheim, CA Lines: 32 Hi, I need someone who is familiar with OS2/PM and/or MS Windows as well as someone who is familiar with both Windows 2 as well as 3 to comment on the following line of reasoning: I want to start a new project using a graphical interface at home using a "PC environment". I have worked with Sunview before and so I am somewhat familiar with the concepts involved, but I have no direct experience with OS2 or MS Windows. My understanding is that even though both OS2/PM and MS Windows were written by Microsoft, THEY ARE MILES APART so porting a program between the two is difficult at best. Eventually, I would like my program to run under BOTH environments. Because of this it seems appropriate to do the Windows version first. First, Windows currently has a larger user base (and thus more customers) and second because in the Windows environment I won't get "suckered" into splitting my task using Multi-tasking concepts and so forth, because for the most part they just are not available under Windows to begin with. I am assuming that the eventual port to OS2/PM would be easier than a port FROM OS2/PM to Windows (given that neither is likely to be "trivial"). Once the decision is made to write the program in Windows, the next question is Windows 2.x or Windows 3.0. The problem with Windows 3.0 is that the customer base is (I presume) signifcantly smaller (unless MS has made the upgrade so cheap "everyone" is upgrading). On the other hand if I write to 2.x, I am already "behind the times" and the product will age faster. Anyone care to comment? frank@odetics