Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!olivea!oliveb!amdahl!rtech!ingres!seg
From: seg@ingres.com (scott e garfinkle)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
Subject: Re: OS/2 2.0 WHEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Message-ID: <1990Sep24.152851.27634@ingres.Ingres.COM>
Date: 24 Sep 90 15:28:51 GMT
References: <992@digi.lonestar.org> <57655@microsoft.UUCP>
Reply-To: seg@Ingres.COM (scott e garfinkle)
Organization: Ingres Corp.
Lines: 16

In article <57655@microsoft.UUCP> steveha@microsoft.UUCP (Steve Hastings) writes:
>In article <992@digi.lonestar.org> cfoughty@digi.lonestar.org (Cy Foughty) writes:
>>I don't know what is taking so long....
>
>
>Well, I am not associated with the OS/2 development efforts, but I can think
>of three reasons OS/2 should take longer than your project:
> ...

I can think of one much better reason:  Microsoft has shifted resources out of
the OS2 project.  Presumably, this happened well in advance of the recent
(infamous) "joint announcement".  It does tend to push back release dates
when you're not working on a project.
	-Scott E. Garfinkle

I speak for nobody but myself.