Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!dptg!ulysses!ucbvax!mdivax1.UUCP!zintel
From: zintel@mdivax1.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.ibm
Subject: Does SSI LU6.2 work ?
Message-ID: <9009210238.AA24853@lilac.berkeley.edu>
Date: 20 Sep 90 22:26:40 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: van-bc!mdivax1!zintel@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 13

Is anyone using SSI's LU6.2 Commlink software under unix in a parallel session
configuration talking to another LU6.2/PU2.1 implementation ? I am having a
problem with a connection to NCP/VTAM and CICS through a B/F NCP connection.
The host can BIND with me, but BINDs sent to the host are rejected with a
sense code X'0835 FFF6' (invalid field in bind).

I have observed that the user data subfield X'03' Session Instance Id and the
control vector X'60' Fully-qualified Procedure Correlation Id are missing from
the bind image. I am wondering if the 2.1 node needs these fields to map
sessions to LUs.
--
Mike Zintel                                       It is wiser to be kind
{uunet,ubc-cs}!van-bc!mdivax1!zintel                than to be wise.