Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!van-bc!mdivax1!zintel
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.ibm
Subject: Does SSI LU6.2 work ?
Message-ID: <1990Sep20.222640.4043@mdivax1.uucp>
Date: 20 Sep 90 22:26:40 GMT
Reply-To: mdivax1!zintel ()
Organization: Mobile Data International, Richmond, B.C., Canada
Lines: 13
Return-Path: <mdivax1!news>
Apparently-To: van-bc!rnews

Is anyone using SSI's LU6.2 Commlink software under unix in a parallel session
configuration talking to another LU6.2/PU2.1 implementation ? I am having a
problem with a connection to NCP/VTAM and CICS through a B/F NCP connection.
The host can BIND with me, but BINDs sent to the host are rejected with a
sense code X'0835 FFF6' (invalid field in bind).

I have observed that the user data subfield X'03' Session Instance Id and the
control vector X'60' Fully-qualified Procedure Correlation Id are missing from
the bind image. I am wondering if the 2.1 node needs these fields to map
sessions to LUs. 
-- 
Mike Zintel                                       It is wiser to be kind
{uunet,ubc-cs}!van-bc!mdivax1!zintel                than to be wise.