Xref: utzoo comp.protocols.iso:1242 comp.protocols.tcp-ip:13088
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!swbull!love
From: love@swbull.bull.se (Love Feuer)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso,comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: SLIP over X.25
Message-ID: <1990Sep21.094227.12937@swbull.bull.se>
Date: 21 Sep 90 09:42:27 GMT
References: <1990Sep18.143414.4441@hq.demos.su> 	<1990Sep19.112128.2154@swbull.bull.se> <BOB.90Sep19164020@volitans.MorningStar.Com>
Organization: Bull AB.
Lines: 18

bob@MorningStar.Com (Bob Sutterfield) writes:
>That's odd.  Far less sick things use UDP, like the Network Time
>Protocol and the Domain Name System.  They're both entirely
>appropriate and necessary to run over long-haul links like X.25.

I am very, very sorry. I did not check my sources. It is
possible to run UDP/IP based protocols over X.25 under B.O.S.,
including NFS. Although I was told otherwise by my friends here at Bull. 

I have remote mounted file systems in Norway to our local machine
in Sweden. And it works, even if it is slow due to the 2400 BPS modem at 
the norwegian side of the network.

Sorry again for any headache that my (incorrect) information might have
caused.

/Love Feuer  Bull Sweden +46-8-7284349
love@swbull.bull.se