Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!munnari.oz.au!murdu!ucsvc.ucs.unimelb.edu.au!u3364521 From: U3364521@ucsvc.ucs.unimelb.edu.au (Lou Cavallo) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Amiga v ST...(LONG'ish) Message-ID: <1066@ucsvc.ucs.unimelb.edu.au> Date: 22 Sep 90 17:07:42 GMT References: <4031@quiche.cs.mcgill.ca> <36848@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU> Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga Organization: I.A.E.S.R., Melbourne University Lines: 45 G'day, I agree with Yeo-Hoon and I'm and Amiga owner! Perhaps the comp news hierarchy needs a flames subgroup (or whatever its called) or (not to offend the non-flamers) a "religion" subgroup for machine comparative discussion? JC> In article <36848@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU>, chu@acsu.buffalo.edu (john c chu) JC> writes: YB> In article <4031@quiche.cs.mcgill.ca> tinyguy@quiche.cs.mcgill.ca YB> (Yeo-Hoon BAE) writes: JC> [Amiga information deleted.] YB> There is a newsgroup (actually, there are many) for discussing Amigas. YB> If you wish to write about Amigas, please use one of them. If there YB> are Amiga discussions on this newsgroup, please re-direct followups to YB> the appropriate Amiga group when you followup etc. I notice there is rarely any Atari vs ST talk in that group. However I feel that some of the "non-serious" discussion should reside elsewhere anyway. Atarians will probably note that a good deal of the discussion is to prevent any misinformation being spread about Amigas. I just agree that this news group may be the wrong place to deal with it ... YB> I'm new at using USENET and I already know this. YB> YB> This post written purely for the purpose of re-directing the YB> followups. (I had been waiting for the participants of the thread to YB> do so, but the thread continues, on the wrong newsgroup.) YB> YB> Followups re-directed to comp.sys.amiga YB> Flames by mail, please. No flames here. Just an additional thought and support. yours truly, Lou Cavallo. Internet: U3364521@ucsvc.unimelb.edu.au PS: please use e-mail if you disagree with me. I may be un-able to reply soon however (I have to defend my PhD termination soon) for quite a while... sorry.