Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!ox.com!umich!vela!dlcogswe From: dlcogswe@vela.acs.oakland.edu (Dan Cogswell) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Amiga Competitiveness. Message-ID: <3134@vela.acs.oakland.edu> Date: 25 Sep 90 22:04:56 GMT References: <31531@nigel.ee.udel.edu> Reply-To: dlcogswe@vela.acs.oakland.edu (Dan Cogswell) Organization: Oakland University, Rochester MI Lines: 17 In article <31531@nigel.ee.udel.edu> WHE46@ccvax.iastate.edu (Marc Barrett) writes: > > BTW, making the A2000 68020-based would make for a nice orderly >progression up the Amiga product line. The A500 would be 68000-based, >the A2000 would be 68020-based, and the A3000 would be 68030-based. I hate to say this, but I agree with him. I thought the 2000 was the best thing since sliced bread when I got it, but it's a bit dissapointing thinking the thing is no faster than my old 500, at three times the price! > -MB- -- Dan Cogswell "In a world full of Ninja Turtles, it's INET: dlcogswe@vela.acs.oakland.edu nice to see Aikido Yoshinkai has BITNET: dlcogswell@oakland preserved it's dignity." HAIRNET: -- Gozo Shioda, 1990