Xref: utzoo comp.sys.amiga:66771 comp.sys.amiga.tech:14621 comp.sys.amiga.hardware:3694 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!sun-barr!rutgers!cunixf.cc.columbia.edu!cunixa.cc.columbia.edu!cmm1 From: cmm1@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Christopher M Mauritz) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga,comp.sys.amiga.tech,comp.sys.amiga.hardware Subject: Re: Multimedia platforms in Personal Workstation Message-ID: <1990Sep24.142727.6368@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> Date: 24 Sep 90 14:27:27 GMT References: <1990Sep23.144316.10200@zip.eecs.umich.edu> Sender: news@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (The Daily News) Reply-To: cmm1@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Christopher M Mauritz) Distribution: na Organization: Columbia University Lines: 30 In article <1990Sep23.144316.10200@zip.eecs.umich.edu> gilgalad@dip.eecs.umich.edu (Ralph Seguin) writes: >Sorry for the repost, but it seems that everybody seems to have missed >the post I made (maybe I set the domain to mi instead of na). Anyways, >here is the thing: If you flip through the latest issue of Personal >Workstation, they have an article on Multimedia, the present and future. >They pick what they think are the ideal multimedia platforms for today >and tommorrow. The really interesting thing is that there is ABSOLUTELY >NO MENTION OF THE AMIGA. Truly sad 8-( Yah, I noticed that. Frankly, I'm at a loss to explain it. One of the systems reviewed was an Intel box (I think). I hardly think ANY Intel box can compete on a price/performance basis (or even just a performance basis given expenditures don't exceed $10K or so) with the Amiga 3000 for Multimedia applications. It is true that the Amiga lacks software in some areas, but I wasn't aware that the multimedia area was one of them. I'm astonished at the A3000's absence. > See ya, Ralph > Cheers, Chris ------------------------------+--------------------------- Chris Mauritz |D{r det finns en |l, finns cmm1@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu |det en plan! (c)All rights reserved. | Send flames to /dev/null | ------------------------------+---------------------------