Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!apple!agate!darkstar!ucscb.UCSC.EDU!unknown From: unknown@ucscb.ucsc.edu (The Unknown User) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2 Subject: re: a low blow from Apple Message-ID: <7055@darkstar.ucsc.edu> Date: 20 Sep 90 23:46:55 GMT Sender: usenet@darkstar.ucsc.edu Organization: University of California, Santa Cruz; Open Access Computing Lines: 37 >Robert MacAusland said: >>Scott Rothstein said: >>Apparently, Apple felt that ][ compatibility was more important than making a >>truly great machine. We could have had a fast machine -- they cut it back to >>fit the architecture for the older ]['s. >>scottr@applesauce.bb.ny > >I think that about sums it all up. I would gladly give of ][ compatibility >in order to make the GS the machine it should have been in the first place. There is no way I can understand this mentality. If you don't want Apple II compatibility, GET AN AMIGA OR A MAC II or some other machine. You may think I'm not being "faithful" to the Apple II, but that's JUST what I'm being! I think I'm one of the people that harp the most about being fauthful to the Apple II. But I see no reason in having a "GS" that's not Apple II compatible. Are you talking about a machine based on a 65816? -WHY- if it's not II compatible? I am ABSOLUTELY serious. Something, ANYTHING, with hardware multiply and divide instructions would have a major advantage at least in that one aspect.. (Anything math related would be faster on an otherwise similar speed CPU as far as I can tell). Also, it sure wouldn't bode well for Apple to have -3- different types of machines when they don't seem to be supporting two equally as well as it is. You mean for a "GS" you want a machine with neat graphics and good sound? Get an Amiga. (But it doesn't have sound anywhere near as good as the GS we currently have that's II compatible!) I just wish someone could explain this mentality. Jeez, I screamed a lot in this post too, huh? (heh heh). -- / Apple II(GS) Forever! unknown@ucscb.ucsc.edu \ \If cartoons were for adults, they'd be on in prime time./