Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!TAUNOS.BITNET!L77
From: L77@TAUNOS.BITNET
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Subject: MOUSETALK
Message-ID: <9009231321.AA03170@apple.com>
Date: 23 Sep 90 11:36:32 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 19

This goes out to all USI MouseTalk users,if there are any more left.
I've been using Mousetalk since very shortly after I got my GS,early '87.
Towards the end of '88,I got the  v1.5 upgrade.It was still not bug-free,
but still,I found,reasonably feature packed,and very,very enjoyable to use.
I still LOVE this program,but clearly there are things to improve there,not
only because time passed and new programs set the standart higher,and not
only because there are things one realizes had better been changed only after
having used the program for a lengthier time,but mainly because YOU CAN'T
LEAVE USERS WHO PAID GOOD MONEY WITH A BUGFULL PRODUCT.-this is,of course,
unless USI've gone out of business.(Have they????????).we're talking about
more than 2 years without even a minimal bug-fix-update.(V 1.50 is dated
July 18,1988).I'm not sure how many out there still use MouseTalk,or feel
like I do.Anyway,if there's enough response to this posting,I think that
working some kind of note to USI could be a good idea.

I'd also be glad to hear something from USI people on the net,there used to be
some back 2-3 years ago.

All this applys if USI is still *8-) in bisiness.Otherwise,*8-(...too bad!!!!.