Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ncar!umigw!mthvax!bsherman
From: bsherman@mthvax.cs.miami.edu (Bob Sherman)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Subject: Re: MOUSETALK
Message-ID: <1990Sep23.203310.17461@mthvax.cs.miami.edu>
Date: 23 Sep 90 20:33:10 GMT
References: <9009231321.AA03170@apple.com>
Organization: Not much!
Lines: 23

In <9009231321.AA03170@apple.com> L77@TAUNOS.BITNET writes:

>This goes out to all USI MouseTalk users,if there are any more left.
>I've been using Mousetalk since very shortly after I got my GS,early '87.
>Towards the end of '88,I got the  v1.5 upgrade.It was still not bug-free,
>but still,I found,reasonably feature packed,and very,very enjoyable to use.
>I still LOVE this program,but clearly there are things to improve there,not
>only because time passed and new programs set the standart higher,and not
>only because there are things one realizes had better been changed only after
>having used the program for a lengthier time,but mainly because YOU CAN'T
>LEAVE USERS WHO PAID GOOD MONEY WITH A BUGFULL PRODUCT.-this is,of course,
>unless USI've gone out of business.(Have they????????).we're talking about
>more than 2 years without even a minimal bug-fix-update.(V 1.50 is dated
>July 18,1988).I'm not sure how many out there still use MouseTalk,or feel
>like I do.Anyway,if there's enough response to this posting,I think that
>working some kind of note to USI could be a good idea.

You might want to direct your notes to the attention of Robert Williamson,
who is the President of USI. I spoke with him about 2 months ago, and
he said USI was still in business..

-- 
   bsherman@mthvax.cs.miami.edu | bsherman@pro-exchange | MCI MAIL:BSHERMAN