Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!uw-beaver!ubc-cs!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!boulder!ub!acsu.buffalo.edu
From: cromwell@acsu.buffalo.edu (mark j cromwell)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Subject: Re: RISC Machines
Message-ID: <37682@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU>
Date: 26 Sep 90 12:58:44 GMT
References: <8139.apple.net@pro-angmar>
Sender: news@acsu.Buffalo.EDU
Organization: SUNY Buffalo
Lines: 15
Nntp-Posting-Host: lictor.acsu.buffalo.edu

In article <8139.apple.net@pro-angmar> m.tiernan@pro-angmar.UUCP (Michael Tiernan) writes:
>In-Reply-To: message from herwin@pro-novapple.cts.com
>I doubt that Apple is going to be releasing any more RISC machines, the ones
>that they have they aren't supporting.  (Opinion that is changing slowly)
>
>What RISC machines you say?  How about the original, 65?02 based processors?

   The 65x02 aren't RISC processors. They're accumulator microprocessors.






				- Mark Cromwell