Xref: utzoo comp.sys.atari.st:31066 comp.sys.amiga:66516
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!know!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!unix.cis.pitt.edu!jimmy
From: jimmy@unix.cis.pitt.edu (James G Tauberg)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st,comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Toothless Byte (Re: TT desktop & prices)
Message-ID: <40357@unix.cis.pitt.edu>
Date: 21 Sep 90 03:03:25 GMT
References: <49561@brunix.UUCP> <2288@atari.UUCP> <14445@cbmvax.commodore.com> <82@maxx.UUCP>
Reply-To: jimmy@unix.cis.pitt.edu (James G Tauberg)
Organization: Univ. of Pittsburgh, Comp & Info Services
Lines: 34


In article <82@maxx.UUCP> tyager@maxx.UUCP (Tom Yager) writes:


>In article <14445@cbmvax.commodore.com>, daveh@cbmvax.commodore.com (Dave Haynie) writes:
>> >Hopefully, the TT will get a more thorough review.
>> 
>
>Atari has a reputation of being uncooperative with non-Atari-specific mags. We
>have never, to my knowledge, gotten a review unit of ANY recent Atari machine.
>We ask, brother do we ask, but we never get a response.



	"We have never, to my knowledge, gotten a review unit..."
I guess it all depends on your definition of "recent Atari machine."

-------------------
Check these issues:
-------------------
March 1986 Vol. 11, No. 3 issue of Byte.
	"Product Preview:  The Atari 1040 ST"
	by Phillip Robinson and Jon R. Edwards 
	Two Byte editors take a look at Atari's new $999 1-megabyte machine
	pg. 84

June 1986 (no Vol. no No.) issue of Byte.
	REVIEWS:  "THE ATARI 520ST"
	by Eric jensen
	A good engine for bit-mapped graphics,  pg. 233


Thought you might like to know,
Jim Tauberg