Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!unix.cis.pitt.edu!jimmy
From: jimmy@unix.cis.pitt.edu (James G Tauberg)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: it would be nice (Right Of Reply) Pauvre Marc!
Message-ID: <40964@unix.cis.pitt.edu>
Date: 23 Sep 90 18:12:31 GMT
References: <101.26ef7641@vx24.cc.monash.edu.au> <2285@gmuvax2.gmu.edu> <6419@castle.ed.ac.uk> <6440@castle.ed.ac.uk>
Reply-To: jimmy@unix.cis.pitt.edu (James G Tauberg)
Organization: Univ. of Pittsburgh, Comp & Info Services
Lines: 32

In article <6440@castle.ed.ac.uk> aiajms@castle.ed.ac.uk (-=Andy=-) writes:
>
>... and as for hi-res displays, at least Amiga owners
>dont have to pull plugs out of their computers every 2 secs for the
>second monitor they would have to buy!!


	This shows obvious ignorance.  There are several monitor
switchers available for the ST.  There are also switchers which allow
the use of 3rd party MULTI-Syncs....   Of course WE already know this...
It would be nice if these AMIGA USERS would GET THEIR FACTS STRAIGHT...
or better yet just stop their childish challenges.  It is really just
making them look stupid.



Then -=andy=- writes:
>
>I believe in critical argument, after all freedom of speech is
>fundamental to our very existence. But I would prefer to have a
>qualified argument, and not some bandwidth wasting drivel. Secondly, I
>was under the impression this was comp.sys.atari.st which is meant to be
>about ST hardware/software/news/tips etc. From this, I find it very hard
>to comprehend why the Amiga is a discussion point. 


	WE TOTALLY AGREE WITH YOU.  I believe most of your article was
bandwith wasting drive!  comp.sys.atari.st IS MEANT FOR DISCUSSION OF
ST.


Jim Tauberg