Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!aero!usasoc.soc.mil!sparkyfs!ads.com!potomac!jtn From: jtn@potomac.ads.com (John T. Nelson) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps Subject: Re: Intuitive... Message-ID: <9178@potomac.ads.com> Date: 20 Sep 90 13:55:21 GMT References: <1990Sep18.171043@miguel.llnl.gov> <15029@burdvax.PRC.Unisys.COM> Reply-To: jtn@potomac.UUCP (John T. Nelson) Organization: Advanced Decision Systems -- Arlington, Va Lines: 32 >I absolutely agree that the Mac is not "intuitive". > >I think there is a place for the word "intuitive" when discussing Mac >interfaces. However, it should be restricted to mean "obvious to a >Mac user, or trivial for such a user to figure out." I do not believe >this word should be used to a non-Mac-user; to the non-Mac person, the >interface is quite clearly NOT intuitive, and claiming that it is only >poisons the well for any other claims one might make. I don't agree. I was a non-Mac user before I started using the Mac and fe very intuitive and easy to learn. I think the problem here is that you were a user who was prepared for and perhaps expecting a conventional command-line oriented interface, thus your confusion when you couldn't find the "insert command" in MacWrite. There is no insert command when using pencil and paper... why should there be with a mouse and bitmap screen. THe Mac is and can be intuitive if you discard the baggage of old computer interfaces and accept the new futuristic world of mouse-oriented bitmap screens. In other words, non-intrusive intuitive interfaces oriented towards people, not computers. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= ORGANIZATION: Advanced Decision Systems GEOGRAPHIC: Arlington, VA UUCP: kzin!speaker@mimsy.umd.edu INTERNET: jtn@potomac.ads.com SPOKEN: Yo... John! PHONE: (703) 243-1611 PROJECT: The Conrail Locomotive/Harpsichord Fusion Program =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=