Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!lll-winken!unixhub!shelby!morrow.stanford.edu!pangea.Stanford.EDU!rex
From: rex@pangea.Stanford.EDU (Rex Sanders)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
Subject: Re: MacIP
Message-ID: <1990Sep26.173357.6582@morrow.stanford.edu>
Date: 26 Sep 90 17:33:57 GMT
References: <1990Sep3.224339.19176@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au> <Qatbiqy00VokI90kcX@andrew.cmu.edu>
Sender: root@morrow.stanford.edu (Rooter)
Organization: Data Center, Stanford University, California, USA
Lines: 12

In article <Qatbiqy00VokI90kcX@andrew.cmu.edu> nf0i+@andrew.cmu.edu (Norman William Franke, III) writes:
>[referring to Stanford's MacIP]
>However, it's
>really showing it's age, in my opinion. It needs LOTS of work,
>especially in it's FTP. I think NCSA Telnet is more in the free category.

I have a different opinion after comparing the latest versions of NCSA Telnet
and SU-MacIP - MacIP is *much* better for the users in my department - mostly
because MacIP is *easier* to use.

-- Rex Sanders, US Geological Survey
   rex@pmgvax.wr.usgs.gov