Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!snorkelwacker!husc6!spdcc!dyer From: dyer@spdcc.COM (Steve Dyer) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm Subject: Re: MacIP Message-ID: <4203@spdcc.SPDCC.COM> Date: 27 Sep 90 00:28:17 GMT References: <1990Sep3.224339.19176@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au> <1990Sep26.173357.6582@morrow.stanford.edu> Reply-To: dyer@ursa-major.spdcc.com (Steve Dyer) Organization: S.P. Dyer Computer Consulting, Cambridge MA Lines: 15 In article nf0i+@andrew.cmu.edu (Norman William Franke, III) writes: >Yes, it is easier to use. I didn't mean to imply NCSA Telnet was better, >just that it's lest costly in many cases. But, I still think it [MacIP] needs >work, though I use it anyways... Gee, I'm wondering what the matter is with it. I think the point-'n-click FTP client is just great, especially when using it to retrieve stuff from sumex-aim. It un-binhexes stuff automatically too! The Telnet client seems to work OK. Maybe I'm just not picky... -- Steve Dyer dyer@ursa-major.spdcc.com aka {ima,harvard,rayssd,linus,m2c}!spdcc!dyer dyer@arktouros.mit.edu, dyer@hstbme.mit.edu