Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!munnari.oz.au!uhccux!donald.wslab.Hawaii.Edu!whelan
From: whelan@donald.wslab.Hawaii.Edu (Jerry Whelan)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next
Subject: Re: Read the fine print!
Message-ID: <9510@uhccux.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu>
Date: 22 Sep 90 06:32:35 GMT
References: <15640002@hpdmd48.boi.hp.com>
Sender: news@uhccux.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu
Organization: Dot in the Deep Blue Sea
Lines: 11

In article <15640002@hpdmd48.boi.hp.com> sritacco@hpdmd48.boi.hp.com (Steve Ritacco) writes:
=> Why would NeXT design 2 CPU boards that are essentially identical?
=> Actually the slab cpu is not as high performance as the cube, it has
=> lower throughput and can only hold half as much RAM.

	This is interesting, how is it that the slab has lower throughput
than the cube?  I haven't heard mention of this before, is it in terms
of graphics or some other area?  
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
whelan@  (uhunix.uhcc.hawaii.edu || uhccux.BITNET || nextsrv.wslab.hawaii.edu)