Xref: utzoo comp.unix.questions:25640 comp.unix.sysv386:587 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!virtech!cpcahil From: cpcahil@virtech.uucp (Conor P. Cahill) Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions,comp.unix.sysv386 Subject: Re: Reliability of System V 1K file system Keywords: System V, reliability, file systems Message-ID: <1990Sep21.131518.21257@virtech.uucp> Date: 21 Sep 90 13:15:18 GMT References: <5869@suns302.cel.co.uk> Reply-To: cpcahil@virtech.UUCP (Conor P. Cahill) Organization: Virtual Technologies Inc., Sterling VA Lines: 48 In article <5869@suns302.cel.co.uk> ir@cel.co.uk (ian reid) writes: >We are using a 40mb disk with a single / file system built using the default >paramters. Your problems would probably diminish if you had a root file system that was fairly stable (i.e. no user files being created/deleted there). You can do this by creating additional partitions and moving your news stuff to the other partition. The big problem with power loss is that it may be doing things to your system that no OS could protect against. For example, at the point of power loss the disk controller may be dumping junk information to different parts of your disk. I'm not saying that this is happening, just saying that it could. The loss of power to a system (especially from a provider loss which can include all kinds of yucky power things like spikes) is a very bad thing for a system. > 1) Do other people see this problem. We originaly ran our 386/ix systems with no protection (other than the standard surge protection) and had several power losses (usually around two to three a month) without experiencing the problems that you describe. > 2) Are my comments (sketchy though they are) on the workings of the > file system correct? Split you filesystems so that root and /usr are both as small as they have to be and have little or no user data on them (i.e. create yet another partition for your user data (total of three)). > 3) How can we minimise, or alleviate it happening. Get a UPS. Ensure that you have a good surge protector. > 4) I have heard of file system hardening, which as I understand it was > something AT&T put into the kernel around the early days of > System V I believe to go some way towards reducing this problem. > Is this correct, and if so what exactly did it involve? File system hardening involves an ordered updating of the information related to file system changes which should make it harder for fs corruption to occur. -- Conor P. Cahill (703)430-9247 Virtual Technologies, Inc., uunet!virtech!cpcahil 46030 Manekin Plaza, Suite 160 Sterling, VA 22170