Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mailrus!ncar!boulder!ub!canisius!pavlov From: pavlov@canisius.UUCP (Greg Pavlov) Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386 Subject: Re: OS costs Message-ID: <2889@canisius.UUCP> Date: 23 Sep 90 06:07:07 GMT References: <36054@unix.cis.pitt.edu> <70400021@m.cs.uiuc.edu> Organization: Canisius College, Buffalo N.Y. 14208 Lines: 14 In article , hart@blackjack.dt.navy.mil (Michael Hart) writes: > (quoting previous article) > >The BSD license is about as cheap and un-restrictive as they come; it's the > >next best thing to PD. Where possible, they've released pieces of code that > >aren't subject to AT&T license; in any case, you get the code with little > >more than a charge for media/copying, etc.......... but but but BSD told me that I needed the AT&T source license FIRST before getting the BSD license. And the former is NOT cheap, unless you are an officially-sanctioned "Educational Institution". (UNIX, after all, is a proprietary operating system....) greg pavlov, fstrf, amherst, ny