Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!cbnewsl!jssk
From: jssk@cbnewsl.att.com (jeffrey.s.skelton)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: SDK README and Windows.h
Summary: Point well taken.
Keywords: missing, readme, sdk
Message-ID: <1990Sep24.174119.23236@cbnewsl.att.com>
Date: 24 Sep 90 17:41:19 GMT
References: <1990Sep20.013856.18632@cbnewsl.att.com> <27225@usc.edu>
Distribution: na
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 27

In article <27225@usc.edu>, papa@pollux.usc.edu (Marco Papa) writes:
> In article <1990Sep20.013856.18632@cbnewsl.att.com> jssk@cbnewsl.att.com
> |I had a pre-release version of the SDK and it apparently is missing
> |some definitions in the windows.h header and the "released" readme
> |files. Could somebody send these to me?
> 
> If you have a "pre-release" version, then what you are asking is clearly 
> "illegal".  May I suggest anybody thinking about mailing such "copyrighted"
> software as windows.h to read their licensing agreements.  BTW, your
> postmaster will be informed that you are using ATT machines for illegal
> activities.  Take care :-)
> 
> -- Marco
> -- 
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> "Xerox sues somebody for copying?" -- David Letterman
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Point well taken. Actually all I'm interested in is the values of the
WM_DROPOBJECT, etc messages used for communication between the Program
Manager and File Manager (the undocumented ones discussed in the trash can
thread). They were defined in the earlier pre-releases and then disappeared
in the final pre-release. I found the earlier windows.h, so the header is
not needed, but I still have an interest in the sections of the readme
that mention this.

Jeff Skelton