Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!yale!husc6!spdcc!tauxersvilli!alphalpha!nazgul
From: nazgul@alphalpha.com (Kee Hinckley)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: What's what in OPEN LOOK/OpenWindows (long)
Message-ID: <1990Sep21.230416.2399@alphalpha.com>
Date: 21 Sep 90 23:04:16 GMT
References: <9009171845.AA02659@kimba.Eng.Sun.COM> <1210046@hpfcmgw.HP.COM>
Organization: asi
Lines: 14

In article <1210046@hpfcmgw.HP.COM> chan@hpfcmgw.HP.COM (Chan Benson) writes:
>Well I don't have the rationale handy (so hit me with a stick if I'm 
>wrong), but I think one of the reasons Open Look was not chosen was because
>AT&T only offered the spec and a style guide, not an sample implementation.

No.
-- 
Alphalpha Software, Inc.	|	motif-request@alphalpha.com
nazgul@alphalpha.com		|-----------------------------------
617/646-7703 (voice/fax)	|	Proline BBS: 617/641-3722

I'm not sure which upsets me more; that people are so unwilling to accept
responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate
everyone else's.