Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!bionet!MENUDO.UH.EDU!davison From: davison@MENUDO.UH.EDU (Dan Davison) Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.genome-program Subject: Re: feature table parsers - what's it all mean? Message-ID: <9010031956.AA19552@genbank.bio.net> Date: 3 Oct 90 19:56:41 GMT References: <9010031936.AA18626@genbank.bio.net> Sender: daemon@genbank.bio.net Lines: 47 > SUMMARY: we need a FULL DEFINITION of GenBank, not just the feature > tables!!! A complete definition is available from the GenBank staff at Los Alamos. Last I knew the name of the document was "dnaform.dc3". It's what I use to guide my programming (sic) that reads GenBank entries. > Example: we should be able to parse out the topology of an entry > (circular or linear sequence) and the references. The topic is > wider than most people have discussed so far, and I don't understand > why GenBank has resisted creating the definition for so long. GenBank et al. can defend themselves, but such a definition does exist and all you'd have had to do was ask...I did in 1982, that's how I found out about it. It has been updated regularly since. > I made the suggestion that a parsable form with an associated > DOCUMENT and DEFINITION is a requirement for the database AT LEAST 8 > YEARS AGO. Another person who wants to break even more existing software. GB staff are very conservative about changes. This drives most of non-GB'ers nuts (because of course we know what's right ;->) but they're right to be conservative on such matters. > How many more years will we have to wait for this? This (genbank-bb) is the place to discuss changes...I'm sure the GB folk have their flameproof suits on whenever they go near a keyboard. Fire away. dan -- dr. dan davison/dept. of biochemical and biophysical sciences/univ. of Houston/4800 Calhoun/Houston,TX 77054-5500/davison@uh.edu/DAVISON@UHOU "Comparing bad weather to rape: 'if it's inevitable, just relax and enjoy it'" Clayton Williams, Republican candidate for Governor of Texas. ...And THIS is the kind of person and attitute most Texans find acceptable...in 1990...very sad. Disclaimer: As always, I speak only for myself, and, usually, only to myself.