Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!mailrus!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: dave@westmark.westmark.com (Dave Levenson)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Answering Machine OGM = Telco Message?
Message-ID: <12635@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Date: 26 Sep 90 01:32:41 GMT
Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu
Organization: Westmark, Inc., Warren, NJ, USA
Lines: 24
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 681, Message 9 of 11


In article <12533@accuvax.nwu.edu>, dattier@ddsw1.mcs.com (David
Tamkin) writes:

> Dave Levenson wrote in Volume 10, Issue 668:

[ regarding my friend in Morristown NJ who forwarded his calls to a
telco-provided SIT and recording ]

> To say that NJ Bell "canceled" your friend's call forwarding is
> ambiguous.  Dave, do you mean that they did a 73# equivalent on his
> line to shut Call Forwarding off or do you mean that they removed the
> Call Forwarding feature from his account?

Sorry!  I didn't mean to be ambiguous here.  NJ Bell performed the 73#
equivalent, and un-forwarded my friend's line until he was able to
return home.  Call forwarding service was never removed from his
account.


Dave Levenson			Internet: dave@westmark.com
Westmark, Inc.			UUCP: {uunet | rutgers | att}!westmark!dave
Warren, NJ, USA			AT&T Mail: !westmark!dave
[The Man in the Mooney]		Voice: 908 647 0900  Fax: 908 647 6857