Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!nih-csl!lhc!adm!husc6!wuarchive!mailrus!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request From: kabra437@pallas.athenanet.com (Ken Abrams) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: Data Lines vs. Voice Lines Message-ID: <12664@accuvax.nwu.edu> Date: 26 Sep 90 21:56:48 GMT Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu Reply-To: Ken Abrams Organization: Athenanet, Inc., Springfield, Illinois Lines: 21 Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 684, Message 3 of 11 In article <12490@accuvax.nwu.edu> stox@balr.com (Ken Stox) writes: > 2) Once digitized at the C.O., the digital data from your >phone call is blocked into packets of data which are routed through >the phone network. This has been explained in some detail in earlier posts but I think a quick recap is in order. While what Mr. Stox says might be true (to some degree) sometime in the not too distant future, it is NOT true today. As far as I know, there are no telco owned switches in service today that use packet switching for voice. At the present time, a path through a digital switch used for voice grade communications is not pre-emptable. Time division multiplexing is NOT the same as packet switching. A voice grade call gets a "full time" channel regardless of what is transported, voice, data or even silence. Ken Abrams uunet!pallas!kabra437 Illinois Bell kabra437@athenanet.com Springfield (voice) 217-753-7965