Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!mailrus!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request From: mitel!spock!grayt@uunet.uu.net (Tom Gray) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: Data Lines vs. Voice Lines Message-ID: <12744@accuvax.nwu.edu> Date: 28 Sep 90 11:54:34 GMT Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu Reply-To: Tom Gray Organization: Mitel. Kanata (Ontario). Canada. Lines: 21 Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 690, Message 7 of 10 In article <12664@accuvax.nwu.edu> Ken Abrams writes: >X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 684, Message 3 of 11 >In article <12490@accuvax.nwu.edu> stox@balr.com (Ken Stox) writes: >> 2) Once digitized at the C.O., the digital data from your >>phone call is blocked into packets of data which are routed through >>the phone network. >quick recap is in order. While what Mr. Stox says might be true (to >some degree) sometime in the not too distant future, it is NOT true >today. As far as I know, there are no telco owned switches in service >today that use packet switching for voice. At the present time, a The ATT IACS (Integrated Access and Control) system uses compression to carry voice data. It is a fast packet system using 384kbit chunks of T1 channels. A whole industry of networking companies is selling compression equipment for private networks - ATT sells its IACS to industry to lower their networking costs.