Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!decwrl!hayes.fai.alaska.edu!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request From: dave@westmark.westmark.com (Dave Levenson) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: Calling Card Questions Message-ID: <12884@accuvax.nwu.edu> Date: 1 Oct 90 13:46:16 GMT Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu Organization: Westmark, Inc., Warren, NJ, USA Lines: 32 Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 702, Message 8 of 12 In article <12784@accuvax.nwu.edu>, lmg@mtqub.att.com (Lawrence M Geary) writes: > If a calling card has your full phone number on it, will the number > automatically change if your areacode changes? I live in the part of > the 201 area that becomes 908 next year. New calling cards will be issued to central NJ customers after the first of the year, containing your new area code. For now, I have found that I can enter my calling card number with either 201 or 908, the same number, and the same PIN. Both are acceptable, whether I'm using MCI or AT&T. > Has anyone compared the surcharges and/or rates charged by the > different types of cards? For example, would it be cheaper to use a NJ > Bell card or an AT&T Universal card to make a given call? (And does it > depend on where one is calling?) You don't really have that choice. NJ Bell's card only works for intra-LATA calls, while the AT&T card only works for inter-LATA calls. The Universal Card is less expensive than AT&T's regular Calling Card for inter-LATA calls, due to the 10% discount. MCI's card is less expensive than the Universal Card unless the call lasts long enough that the higher surcharge for AT&T is offset by the lower per-minute rate that results from the disocunt. Is that perfectly clear? Dave Levenson Internet: dave@westmark.com Westmark, Inc. UUCP: {uunet | rutgers | att}!westmark!dave Warren, NJ, USA AT&T Mail: !westmark!dave Voice: 908 647 0900 Fax: 908 647 6857