Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!decwrl!hayes.fai.alaska.edu!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: ekrell@ulysses.att.com
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Make AT&T Put it in Writing? Why Not MCI?
Message-ID: <12953@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Date: 3 Oct 90 00:50:37 GMT
Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu
Organization: TELECOM Digest
Lines: 12
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 706, Message 4 of 13


>For instance, they claim that they will put your call through faster than
>other carriers.  I have invited AT&T to put this claim in writing,
>most specifically including quantifying how much faster.

If I'm not mistaken, MCI and/or Sprint complained to the FCC about that
claim in AT&T ads, and AT&T presented the FCC enough evidence to have
them drop the charges and let the ads continue to run...
    

Eduardo Krell              AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ
UUCP: {att,decvax,ucbvax}!ulysses!ekrell  Internet: ekrell@ulysses.att.com