Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!bu.edu!dartvax!griggs.dartmouth.edu From: hugo@griggs.dartmouth.edu (Peter Su) Newsgroups: comp.edu Subject: Re: Theoretical computer scientists know a thing or two Keywords: theory Message-ID: <24823@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU> Date: 1 Oct 90 12:34:36 GMT References: <392sis-a@massey.ac.nz> <12007@chaph.usc.edu> <409@pirates.UUCP> <12235@chaph.usc.edu> <24755@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU> <7746@ucdavis.ucdavis.edu> Sender: news@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU Reply-To: hugo@griggs.dartmouth.edu (Peter Su) Organization: Dartmouth College Lines: 36 In-reply-to: matloff@heather.ucdavis.edu (Norm Matloff) In article <7746@ucdavis.ucdavis.edu>, matloff@heather (Norm Matloff) writes: >In article <24755@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU> hugo@griggs.dartmouth.edu (Peter Su) writes: > > >[I do agree with Peter's point, but just for the sake of accuracy...] > > Everyone is correcting me, so I thought I'd clarify what I said. Here is what I wrote: >>little about computer science graduate students. Let me name for you >>a few people with CS PhD's...and a couple who have the equivalent... ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I will admit to being mistaken about Jon Hennesey, EE is not the same as CS. But, he has done a lot of good work in both architecture and in the more theoretical parts of compiler design, which illustrates by point well. >Again, I do agree with Peter's point. There is lots of practical work >done in academia. On the other hand, the other poster is correct to >some extent -- there certainly *are* some Ph.D.s in CS who "don't >know what a bus is." I would assert, though, that the same holds >for a number of people in the Silicon Valley. > > Norm Something to add: I think one should always remember Sturgeon's Law...90% of everything is crap. This applies to industry, academia, computer science, engineering, and certainly goverment. The best one can do is try to stay within the other 10% most of the time. I like to think I do, but sometimes, I'm not so sure. Pete hugo@sunapee.dartmouth.edu