Xref: utzoo comp.lang.c:32265 comp.sys.transputer:2103
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!munnari.oz.au!metro!wolfen!hls0!geoff
From: geoff@hls0.hls.oz (Geoff Bull)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.sys.transputer
Subject: Re: C to occam translator
Keywords: C, transputer, occam
Message-ID: <938@hls0.hls.oz>
Date: 26 Sep 90 20:38:27 GMT
References: <robert.654145325@zeus>
Reply-To: geoff@hls0.highland.oz.au (Geoff Bull)
Organization: Highland Logic Pty. Ltd. , Moss Vale NSW, Australia.
Lines: 9

In article <robert.654145325@zeus> robert%zeus@swanee.ee.uwa.oz.au (Roberto Togneri) writes:

>
>What is the prevailing attitude to transputers and occam? One reason we are

Occam is a real a______e for any reasonable sized program.
It is a really bad D unless your application is really well suited to the Occam
programming model and its not huge. Programmer productivity with Occam is about
10% of that with C. Do yourself a favour - leave Occam alone!