Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!dsac.dla.mil!dsacg3.dsac.dla.mil!dsacg4.dsac.dla.mil!nol2321
From: nol2321@dsacg4.dsac.dla.mil (Jim Dunn)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Subject: Re: Which C compiler: TC or MS?
Message-ID: <2593@dsacg4.dsac.dla.mil>
Date: 4 Oct 90 17:24:54 GMT
References: <2545@dsacg4.dsac.dla.mil> <1990Sep27.152102.26157@pyro.ei.dupont.com> <7343@darkstar.ucsc.edu> <1990Oct1.125842.1443@pyro.ei.dupont.com>
Distribution: usa
Organization: Defense Logistics Agency Systems Automation Center, Columbus
Lines: 14

I guess there's only a few things that really seem ridiculous to me, ONE of
which is someone who WORKS for a company, but doesn't SPEAK for that company,
but spends a TREMENDOUS amount of time trying to straighten people out who
say something about THAT company.

I.e.  Microsoft and Borland and all the others companies employees, when
reading an e-mail or news-mail about THEIR company, should probably keep
their "fingers" shut and simply re-route the msg to the appropriate
person WHO CAN SPEAK FOR THE COMPANY!!!

E.g.  And while you're at it, Borland employee, ask your bosses why they're
not supporting Windows and OS/2 programming???

Anonymously Me, (just check the return address, I'm too poor to afford a sig)