Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!uflorida!mlb.semi.harris.com!thrush.mlb.semi.harris.com!del From: del@thrush.mlb.semi.harris.com (Don Lewis) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains Subject: Re: DNS glue records and BIND 4.8 Message-ID: <1990Oct3.054147.6268@mlb.semi.harris.com> Date: 3 Oct 90 05:41:47 GMT References: <1918@ccadfa.adfa.oz.au> <9009251622.AA13093@venera.isi.edu> Sender: news@mlb.semi.harris.com Distribution: inet Organization: Harris Semiconductor, Melbourne FL Lines: 29 Nntp-Posting-Host: thrush.mlb.semi.harris.com In article <9009251622.AA13093@venera.isi.edu> pvm@venera.isi.edu writes: >Note that one upshot of all this is that you never need glue in the >reverse mapping domains under IN-ADDR.ARPA part of the tree, unless >you create a name server on a machine .in-addr.arpa. >Please don't do this anyway. BIND 4.8.1 (and 4.8.3 it looks like), is kind enough to include glue records in zone transfers of IN-ADDR.ARPA zones if it has the appropriate A records cached. > >There are some special cases, for example the root zone, and NS RRs >that are using aliases (which you shouldn't do anyway.) If you mean NS RRs pointing to CNAME RRs, then this is a very bad idea because it makes BIND go bezerk. It keeps looking for the A RR that goes along with the NS. It keeps making queries for the A RR for the NS, and gets a CNAME RR and the A RR for the name referred to by the CNAME. It then decides that since it doesn't yet have the A RR for the NS, it needs to ask again. > >As a last piece of advice, if you aren't sure, put in the glue. Nope. If you aren't sure, ask a wizard. -- Don "Truck" Lewis Harris Semiconductor Internet: del@mlb.semi.harris.com PO Box 883 MS 62A-028 Phone: (407) 729-5205 Melbourne, FL 32901