Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!maverick.ksu.ksu.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!mrcnext.cso.uiuc.edu!jeffo From: jeffo@mrcnext.cso.uiuc.edu (Jeffrey B Nicholson) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Neat Shell 2.0 Feature! Message-ID: <1990Sep28.055526.8862@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> Date: 28 Sep 90 05:55:26 GMT References: <7747@milton.u.washington.edu> <11472@bula.se> <1990Sep19.224519.6287@ecst.csuchico.edu> <42707@sequent.UUCP> <14597@cbmvax.commodore.com> Sender: news@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (News) Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana Lines: 32 andy@cbmvax.commodore.com (Andy Finkel) writes: >In article <42707@sequent.UUCP> cseaman@sequent.UUCP (Chris "The Bartman" Seaman) writes: >>mrush@csuchico.edu (Matt "C P." Rush) writes: >>< Bjorn Knutsson writes: >>< >dlarson@blake.u.washington.edu (Dale Larson) writes: >>< >That's an OLD WShell feature. It seems to me that Commodore is trying >>< >to catch up with WShell. Well, from what I've seen of the 2.0 shell, >>< >>< One could even go so far as to say that it's an old MS-DOS feature! >> >>If I am interpreting this feature correctly, there is no counterpart in >Actually, its an old SeaShell (by Randell Jesup) feature. Randell convinced >me it was a good idea for 2.0. He probably also convinced Bill Hawes >it was a good idea for Wshell :-) > andy >-- >andy finkel {uunet|rutgers|amiga}!cbmvax!andy >Commodore-Amiga, Inc. Why not just use WShell under 2.0 and get all of WShell's features? Does WShell not run under v2.0? -- Jeff jeffo@mrcnext.cso.uiuc.edu -- Jeff jeffo@mrcnext.cso.uiuc.edu