Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!world!decwrl!ucbvax!PAN.SSEC.HONEYWELL.COM!thompson
From: thompson@PAN.SSEC.HONEYWELL.COM (John Thompson)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apollo
Subject: re: addressees at APOLLo.COM (Apollo's sendmail)
Message-ID: <9010041440.AA12076@pan.ssec.honeywell.com>
Date: 4 Oct 90 14:40:13 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 32


> >to people at HP/Apollo.  If your sendmail that talks to the outside world
> >is old enough to not support MX records (say, like--oops--the Apollo
> >sendmail), then you won't be able to use "apollo.hp.com".  
> Does the version of sendmail shipping with sr10.3 (which we **hope** to be
> getting at long last :-) correctly support the use of named, MX records and
> other related goodies ??? What version is it .... 5.61, or more likely as
> Nat pointed out, something considerably earlier?? (it would be too
> much to expect it to be the recently released 5.64)
The pre-release (bost-beta) 10.3 (10.03.a) that came with our Mentor workstations
responds as follows --
    $ //montreal/usr/lib/sendmail -bt -d99
    Version  5.52 (84)
    ADDRESS TEST MODE
    Enter <ruleset> <address>
    > *** EOF *** 

    $ ts //montreal/usr/lib/sendmail
    Ver Name              Time Stamp                     File Name
    --------------------------------------------------------------
    c 1 version           1989/09/28  9:15:56 CDT (Thu)  //montreal/usr/lib/sendmail


Doesn't look too modern to my eye.

John Thompson (jt)
Honeywell, SSEC
Plymouth, MN  55441
thompson@pan.ssec.honeywell.com

As ever, my opinions do not necessarily agree with Honeywell's or reality's.
(Honeywell's do not necessarily agree with mine or reality's, either)