Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!know!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!ucsd!ucbvax!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!nuug!sigyn.idt.unit.no!hanche From: hanche@imf.unit.no (Harald Hanche-Olsen) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apollo Subject: Re: addressees at APOLLo.COM (Apollo's sendmail) Message-ID: Date: 4 Oct 90 14:20:45 GMT References: <1990Sep30.171715.4183@eagle.lerc.nasa.gov> <101020008@hpcvlx.cv.hp.com> <1990Oct2.140857@apollo.HP.COM> Sender: news@idt.unit.no (Usenet news admin) Organization: The Norwegian Institute of Technology, Trondheim, Norway. Lines: 28 In-Reply-To: ianh@bhpmrl.oz.au's message of 4 Oct 90 22:54:54 GMT In article ianh@bhpmrl.oz.au (Ian Hoyle) writes: Does the version of sendmail shipping with sr10.3 (which we **hope** to be getting at long last :-) correctly support the use of named, MX records and other related goodies ??? What version is it .... 5.61, or more likely as Nat pointed out, something considerably earlier?? (it would be too much to expect it to be the recently released 5.64) hufsa 64 % /com/bldt **** Node 1BAA4 **** "//hufsa" Domain/OS kernel(10), revision 10.3, beta3 June 6, 1990 1:59:14 pm =========== hufsa 65 % /usr/lib/sendmail -bs 220 hufsa Sendmail 5.52 (85)/imf-C-1.4 ready at Thu, 4 Oct 90 15:09:19 +0100 ======== quit 221 hufsa closing connection I am very much afraid this answers your question. The good news is that "porting" 5.61 to the Apollo is almost no work at all (hence one wonders why HPollo did not bother); and with luck, 5.64 may be just as easy. - Harald Hanche-Olsen Division of Mathematical Sciences The Norwegian Institute of Technology N-7034 Trondheim, NORWAY