Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!decwrl!shelby!agate!darkstar!ucscb.UCSC.EDU!unknown From: unknown@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (The Unknown User) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2 Subject: Re: Woz giveth, Scully taketh away Message-ID: <7408@darkstar.ucsc.edu> Date: 2 Oct 90 06:43:32 GMT References: <4756@crash.cts.com> <1990Oct2.044919.12938@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> Sender: usenet@darkstar.ucsc.edu Organization: University of California, Santa Cruz; Open Access Computing Lines: 28 In article <1990Oct2.044919.12938@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> knauer@cs.uiuc.edu (Rob Knauerhase) writes: >In article <4756@crash.cts.com> bobl@pro-graphics.cts.com (Bob Lindabury) writes: >This is bad; mere doomsaying. "The sky is falling..." >Apple has released so many Mac CPU's in the past four years that I've >stopped paying close attention to their differences. Why should we give up >faith just because Apple's releasing three more? :) [Ill-disguised cynicism.] Are any of the Macs so close in abilities that they are analogous to the 'upgrade' from the ROM 01 to ROM 03 GS? I think they just dropped one a few weeks ago that really wasn't much different.. a few hundred more bucks (when you're that expensive already, a few hundred doesn't make much difference! heh) and you greatly improved the abilities.. So I think the lower one wasn't selling well.. This was the IIcx and IIci or something like that. (probably wrong here) Your statements about how the GS would be perfect for where the PS/1 is supposed to go are correct. HELL, I would'nt care TOO MUCH if they advertized it as the 'inexpensive computer with the Mac interface'.. AS LONG AS THEY ADVERTIZE IT.. And whoever wrote it release the (finished) Excel workalike program they wrote! {As an aside, I call it the APPLE interface rather than the MAC interface.. Yeah, I guess if we were totally technical, I'd call it the Xerox/PARC interface, but oh well} -- / Apple II(GS) Forever! unknown@ucscb.ucsc.edu \ \"If cartoons were meant for adults, they'd be on in prime time."-Lisa Simpson/