Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!ucsd!nosc!crash!pro-sol.cts.com!mdavis From: mdavis@pro-sol.cts.com (Morgan Davis) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2 Subject: Tax on computers! Message-ID: <4796@crash.cts.com> Date: 3 Oct 90 18:36:14 GMT Sender: root@crash.cts.com Lines: 110 A thousand apologies if this has already been posted. Due to the irritating Mac vs. Apple II debates by the Apple II hardliners, I've resigned to reading only the headers for interesting messages here. Anyway, I'm digressing. I received the following message from Ron Lichty on America Online and felt the need to get the word out to the comp-sys-apple2 community ASAP. ----------- Date: 90-10-03 04:32:43 EDT From: RonLichty Subj: Tax on computers! To: KSUTHER, CecilFret, SteveAdept, MDavis, KennS, GRMORRISON Item forwarded by Ron Lichty Sub: new computer luxury tax BACKGROUND ON NEW COMPUTER LUXURY TAX In Washington, members of the Bush Administration, the House of Representatives and Senate have been meeting in a budget summit to negotiate a bipartisan plan to reduce the deficit. They have been considering various proposals to raise new taxes as part of package. One item that should be of concern to the computing community is a luxury tax on electronics products. While most of us in the computer industry originally believed that the tax was aimed at high end TV's, VCR's, Camcorders, and other consumer electronic entertainment products, it appears that computers have been included as taxable products. HOW THE TAX WOULD WORK The luxury tax is a 10% tax assessed on the value of the following luxury items over the following threshholds: Cars over $30,000 Furs over $500 Jewelry over $5,000 ELECTRONICS over $1,000 For example, if you purchase a personal computer that costs you $3,000, you will have to pay a 10% luxury tax on the amount over $1,000. Hence, in this example, you will pay $200 (10% of ($3,000-1,000)) in addition to the sales tax when you purchase the computer at the register. APPLE'S POSITION We at Apple Computer feel that extending this tax to cover personal computers is preposterous. Computers increase the productivity of workers, teachers and students. It is inappropriate to impose a "luxury" tax on the tools which can boost American productivity. As a nation, we must be prepared to manage our affairs in the Information Age--an age in which computer equipment is not a luxury but a necessity. Yet, the Congress and the Administration seem to be unable to recognize the critical role computers now play in the lives of millions of Americans. In addition, the threshhold for computers is rediculously low. Only high-end car models are over $30,000. Only a small percentage of jewelry purchased is over $5,000. But for computers, $1,000 is the low end of the market. Most computers sold exceed this amount. It makes little sense to impose a luxury tax on a college student's investment in a personal computer while exempting the purchase of a $5,000 Rolex wrist watch. GAME PLAN If anybody is concerned about this proposal, telephone calls to Congressional representatives and senators could be a critical help. Interested persons should do the following: - call their congressional representative's local office to register their opposition to the proposed luxury tax on computers. - ask their representative to voice their concerns to the legislators who are negotiating in the budget summit. - call members of the budget summit in Washington, D.C. to register their opposition to the luxury tax: Capitol Hill Senate: (202) 224-3121 Capitol Hill House: (202) 225-3121 White House: (202) 456-1414 PARTICIPANTS IN THE BUDGET SUMMIT Rep. Tom Foley (D-WA) Rep. Richard Gephardt (D-MO) Rep. Leon Panetta (D-CA) Rep. Robert Michel (R-IL) Rep. Bill Frenzel (R-MN) Rep. Bill Archer (R-TX) Sen. George Mitchell (D-ME) Sen. Bob Dole (R-KS) Sen. Lloyd Bentsen (D-TX) Sen. Bob Packwood (R-OR) Sen. Jim Sasser (D-TN) Sen. Pete Domenici (R-NM) Sen. Wyche Fowler, Jr. (D-GA) Richard Darman (Director, Office of Management and Budget) Nicholas Brady (Secretary of the Treasury) John Sununu (White House Chief of Staff) Roger Porter (Assistant to the President) If people are interested in helping to beat back this proposal, time is of the essence. It could be a matter of days, not weeks. A luxury tax is very likely to be enacted. The question is whether or not it will be extended to computers. UUCP: crash!pro-sol!mdavis AOL, BIX: mdavis ARPA: crash!pro-sol!mdavis@nosc.mil GEnie: m.davis42 INET: mdavis@pro-sol.cts.com ProLine: mdavis@pro-sol