Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!watserv1!maytag!watdragon!rose!hardware
From: hardware@rose.uwaterloo.ca
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: atari.st.games (Was: Dungeon master, ftl)
Message-ID: <1990Sep29.212203.2504@watdragon.waterloo.edu>
Date: 29 Sep 90 21:22:03 GMT
References: <1990Sep10.130100.17851@lth.se> <15330012@hpfinote.HP.COM> <8798@b11.ingr.com> <1002@materna.uucp> <1990Sep27.165322@avahi.inria.fr>
Sender: daemon@watdragon.waterloo.edu (Owner of Many System Processes)
Organization: University of Waterloo
Lines: 35

In article <1990Sep27.165322@avahi.inria.fr> colas@avahi.inria.fr (Colas Nahaboo) writes:
>jack@leo.UUCP (Jack Benkual) writes:
> > BTW how about forming a discussion group for atari.st.games? Amiga has one.
>
>I think it is unecessary. Most games are the same on the amiga and the atari,
>so we can share the same newsgroup (which I do).

  Well I could care less if amiga has a games base let them stay on there









 bases and we can enjoy a new atari message base for games!

 It is necessary for three reasons. One I have source files in C,GFA, and
Stos that support game programming! Two there are far more Atari games
than there are Amiga games(Now Amiga owners dont get huffy,we have been
around longer!) Three most Atari games are unique and have no amiga equivalent!

 Put another vote in for me for a new Atari Games Base!
 I have hundreds of PD games for the Atari with no equivalent on other machines,this is mainly due to STOS being out longer than Amos.

  Hardware Dave putting the 100 vote on this so why isnt somebody doing
  something about it. At least over a 3 month period we can get this going.
  Already the comp.sys.atari.tech base has grown rapidly. 

******************************************************************************
Hardware Dave at your Service
Good movie to see if you like sci fi is " Krull"
******************************************************************************