Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!cica!iuvax!purdue!mentor.cc.purdue.edu!seaman.cc.purdue.edu!ags
From: ags@seaman.cc.purdue.edu (Dave Seaman)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.handhelds
Subject: Re: No UNDO on the 48SX?????
Message-ID: <14615@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>
Date: 1 Oct 90 14:41:24 GMT
References: <20093.270473cf@oregon.uoregon.edu> <6388@hub.ucsb.edu> <34421@cup.portal.com>
Sender: news@mentor.cc.purdue.edu
Reply-To: ags@seaman.cc.purdue.edu (Dave Seaman)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Purdue University
Lines: 10

In article <34421@cup.portal.com> sjthomas@cup.portal.com (Stephen J Thomas) writes:
>On the 48SX, the UNDO function is renames LAST STACK......I think UNDO is
>catchier!    steve thomas

But UNDO would be an inaccurate name, unless it truly undoes the previous
operation (such as a STO or ASN or CLVAR, for example).

--
Dave Seaman	  					
ags@seaman.cc.purdue.edu