Path: utzoo!dciem!nttor!contact!zooid!dve
From: dve@zooid.UUCP (David Mason)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: MFM -- RLL drive
Message-ID: <Xae5P2w162w@zooid.UUCP>
Date: 26 Sep 90 16:21:44 GMT
References: <3368@bnr-rsc.UUCP>
Organization: here
Lines: 13

pdwalker@bcarh471.bnr.ca (Paul D Walker) writes:

> PS: by the way.  If you are crammed up at 70meg of disk space, then the 
>     extra 30 meg you will fill up in a short order.  :)

Thanks for the comments. Yes, I'm well aware that the more disk space I 
have,the more data that will mysteriously appear. However, I just want room 
for my major applications, I don't mind swapping data so much.

But we do have a point of disagrement.  A previous message stated that 
drives older than two years were better for RLLing (if they were certified 
for MFM, but not tested for RLL). You claim that newer drives are better. I 
don't think this one can be resolved though, because you both have points.