Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!udel!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!o.gp.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!nf0i+ From: nf0i+@andrew.cmu.edu (Norman William Franke, III) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm Subject: Re: MacIP Message-ID: Date: 26 Sep 90 23:56:21 GMT References: <1990Sep3.224339.19176@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au> , <1990Sep26.173357.6582@morrow.stanford.edu> Organization: Class of '92, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA Lines: 17 In-Reply-To: <1990Sep26.173357.6582@morrow.stanford.edu> On 26-Sep-90 in Re: MacIP user Rex Sanders@pangea.Stanf writes: >I have a different opinion after comparing the latest versions of NCSA Telnet >and SU-MacIP - MacIP is *much* better for the users in my department - mostly >because MacIP is *easier* to use. Yes, it is easier to use. I didn't mean to imply NCSA Telnet was better, just that it's lest costly in many cases. But, I still think it needs work, though I use it anyways... ............................................................ : : : Norman Franke, III nf0i+@andrew.cmu.edu : : Special Projects Carnegie Mellon University : : Macintosh Users Group, VP Pittsburgh, PA : :..........................................................: "Why can't I get more quota?"