Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!aplcen!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!ucsd!nosc!crash!erich From: erich@crash.cts.com (Eric Hicks) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hypercard Subject: Re: Claris HyperCard Version 3.0 Message-ID: <4773@crash.cts.com> Date: 2 Oct 90 19:55:17 GMT References: <3528@dftsrv.gsfc.nasa.gov> <90275.092413SAS102@psuvm.psu.edu> Organization: Crash TimeSharing, El Cajon, CA Lines: 31 In article <90275.092413SAS102@psuvm.psu.edu> SAS102@psuvm.psu.edu (Steven A. Schrader) writes: >In article <3528@dftsrv.gsfc.nasa.gov>, pease@amarna.gsfc.nasa.gov (Pease) says: > >I think the real point is "Who cares if Bill gives it away?" We all have HIS >version 1.2.x. What we want is HC 2.0, in which Bill had very little to do. >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Steven A. Schrader (SAS102 @ Psuvm.Bitnet) > Student Consultant Coordinater > Student Support Initiative, The Center for Academic Computing > The Pennsylvania State University I care. The reason I care is that if Bill does give away the source to HyperCard 1.2.x, then I am confident that we in the public can, using the "paper in the drawer" method, put out a product that will do well. (well in the sense that it will be popular. Obviously it will make little, if any money for anyone.) If public enrichment of HyperCard 1.2.x causes Claris to lose money on HyperCard 2.0, perhaps they will no longer think that they can get away with this sort of thing in the future. (This assumes, of course, that my data concerning Apple's ignoring their contract with Bill are accurate.) <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> < UUCP: {nosc ucsd hplabs!hp-sdd}!crash!erich > < ARPA: crash!erich@nosc.mil > < INET: erich@crash.cts.com > < > < DISCLAIMER: My opinions are a figment of your imagination. > < > < "At last, after 2000 years of work, the Eludium PU-36 > < explosive space modulator." > <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>